Knaust et al., 2012
| Author(s): | Knaust, D., Curran, H. A., Dronov, A. V. |
|---|---|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Title: | Shallow-marine carbonates |
| Journal: | Developments in Sedimentology |
| Volume: | 64 |
| Book: | Trace Fossils as Indicators of Sedimentary Environments |
| Publisher: | Elsevier |
| Pages: | 705-750 |
| Abstract | The ichnology of carbonate sedimentary systems is less well studied compared to that of siliciclastic systems. Shallow-marine carbonates differ from their siliciclastic counterparts by a number of criteria, such as the composition and distribution of trace-fossil associations, broad and very shallow facies belts with intense bioturbation and subaerial exporsure, and a strong impact of diagenetic processes on carbonate sediments. Early cementation typically leads to the occurrence of firmgrounds and hardgrounds with intense bioerosion and preferential trace-fossil preservation. The Psilonichnus, Skolithos, and Cruziana ichnofacies are important for the reconstruction of paleoenvironments on carbonate shelves (or ramps), whereas the substrate-controlled Glossifungites and Trypanites ichnofacies can overprint the former ones during periods with stagnant or low net-sediment accumulation. The value of ichnological analysis in shallow-marine carbonates is demonstrated on Middle Ordovician cool-water carbonates in Russia, Middle Triassic epicontinental carbonates in Germany, the Quaternary rimmed carbonate platform of the Bahamas, and the Quaternary homoclinal carbonate ramp of the southern Arabian Gulf. |
| Remarks: | Raamatuseeria: Developments in sedimentology |
| Keywords: | Baltica, Bioerosion, Carbonates, Ordovician, Paleontology, Shallow-marine, St. Petersburg Region, Trace fossils, Triassic |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53813-0.00023-X |
| SARV-WB: | edit record |