Knaust et al., 2012

Author(s):Knaust, D., Curran, H. A., Dronov, A. V.
Year:2012
Title:Shallow-marine carbonates
Journal:Developments in Sedimentology
Volume:64
Book:Trace Fossils as Indicators of Sedimentary Environments
Publisher:Elsevier
Pages:705-750
Abstract

The ichnology of carbonate sedimentary systems is less well studied compared to that of siliciclastic systems. Shallow-marine carbonates differ from their siliciclastic counterparts by a number of criteria, such as the composition and distribution of trace-fossil associations, broad and very shallow facies belts with intense bioturbation and subaerial exporsure, and a strong impact of diagenetic processes on carbonate sediments. Early cementation typically leads to the occurrence of firmgrounds and hardgrounds with intense bioerosion and preferential trace-fossil preservation. The Psilonichnus, Skolithos, and Cruziana ichnofacies are important for the reconstruction of paleoenvironments on carbonate shelves (or ramps), whereas the substrate-controlled Glossifungites and Trypanites ichnofacies can overprint the former ones during periods with stagnant or low net-sediment accumulation. The value of ichnological analysis in shallow-marine carbonates is demonstrated on Middle Ordovician cool-water carbonates in Russia, Middle Triassic epicontinental carbonates in Germany, the Quaternary rimmed carbonate platform of the Bahamas, and the Quaternary homoclinal carbonate ramp of the southern Arabian Gulf.

Remarks:Raamatuseeria: Developments in sedimentology
Keywords:Baltica, Bioerosion, Carbonates, Ordovician, Paleontology, Shallow-marine, St. Petersburg Region, Trace fossils, Triassic
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53813-0.00023-X
SARV-WB:edit record